KPM

Inventory Management WIP Non-GAAP Metrics Reduce Billing Bottlenecks Auditor Independence Accounting Methods Year-End Financials Auditing Revenue Recognition Inventory Management System Access To Capital M&A Due Diligence What Is Materiality Job-Costing Systems Technology Bank Reconciliation Cybersecurity New Segment Expense Disclosure Rules QuickBooks To Prepare 2024 Budgets Safeguard Organization Assets Offsetting Rules Inventory Count negotiation M&A Accounting Monthly Financial Close Shareholder advance Payroll challenges Prepare for audit QuickBooks income tax Crypto Accounting Percentage-Of-Completion Financial Statement PCAOB Overhead Mileage in QuickBooks UTPs Cross-Train Employee Benefit Plan Audits Accounts Receivable

Auditors’ Watchdog Role Requires Professional Skepticism

CPA stands for Certified Public Accountant. Although the company pays their fees, public company auditors work for the audit committee and the public in general, not management. This ‘public watchdog’ role demands that auditors exercise professional skepticism throughout the audit process.

This role helps explain why auditors want concrete, third-party evidence to verify management’s assertions. Here is a closer look at how professional skepticism factors into an audit.

Professional skepticism

All aspects of an audit benefit from professional skepticism. Specifically, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) expects auditors to:

  • Identify & assess risks of material misstatement
  • Test controls & substantive procedures
  • Evaluate audit results to form an audit opinion

These expectations also apply to auditors of private companies. The American Institute of CPAs’ Code of Professional Conduct requires CPAs to be independent from their attestation clients. In other words, auditors must 1) act with integrity, and 2) exercise objectivity and professional skepticism.

Areas of interest

Professional skepticism is particularly important in examining areas that involve significant management judgment or transactions outside the normal course of business. Examples of such areas include non-recurring reserves, financing transactions, and related-party transactions. In addition, auditors consider the impact of uncorrected misstatements, evaluate the potential for management bias, and assess whether financial statements are presented fairly.

Professional skepticism also plays a critical role in an auditor’s consideration of fraud. Where the risk of fraud is high, an auditor might modify planned audit procedures to gather more reliable evidence in support of financial statement assertions. For example, an auditor might obtain confirmation from an independent third party, engage a specialist, or examine documentation from independent sources to corroborate management representations.

A win-win situation

The purpose of an audit is to provide investors, lenders, and other stakeholders with an opinion that management-prepared financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework. Without professional skepticism, the value of an audit is impaired. So it is in your best interests to understand what professional skepticism means and how to apply it throughout the audit process.

Are you looking for a qualified team of auditors to help provide a realistic evaluation of your business? Contact KPM today to see how we can partner with you.

Related Articles

Talk with the pros

Our CPAs and advisors are a great resource if you’re ready to learn even more.