KPM

Pivot strategy Payroll Risks Generative AI For Businesses Financial Statements Sec. 179 Tax Deduction Health Care Plan Assessing Customer Credit QBI Deduction Cash Withdrawal Small business retirement Spouse travel expenses Accounting Software Strategic Planning Process Insurance Schemes Enterprise Risk Management Program Account-Based Marketing Wrong Software For Your Organization Operational Review Internal Benchmarking Reports Sales approach Capturing Data Older Workers Pooled Employer Plans Financial Statement Options BOI Reporting Rules Privileged Users Medicare Premiums DOL Business valuation Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Value-Based Sales Fringe Benefits Green Lease Strategic Planning Financial Reporting Marketing Strategy Succession planning health care benefits Cyberinsurance PTO Buying Media Screening Pipeline Management Billing Best Practices Solo 401(k)

Innovate or Acquire? That is the Strategic Question.

Many companies reach a point in their development where they have to make an important decision: innovate themselves or acquire a competitor? Of course, it is not always an either/or decision. Nonetheless, business owners should consider the pluses and minuses of both approaches.

Innovating to grow

Innovation is a broad term that encompasses many strategies; all of which are intended to help the company achieve goals such as boosting profits, improving cash flow, or diversifying products or services. Common strategies are:

  • Research & development of new products
  • New market penetration via geographic expansion or enhanced product/service offerings
  • Increased productivity resulting from internal improvements or enhancements

Each strategy takes time, effort, and capital. Understandably, business leaders can be hesitant to devote such vital resources to innovation initiatives and risk decreases in productivity and profitability.

Combining companies

For companies that do not want to bet the farm on internal development, acquisitions can be appealing. If you are looking to expand a product line, for example, it might be more time and cost-effective to buy a competitor that already offers the goods you want.

Your acquisition target has already done the hard work, including funding, testing, and creating the product or service and building a client base. By buying this competitor, you may incur less risk than you would by investing your own capital and building the product from scratch. The same holds true for geographic expansion and productivity improvements.

But business combinations come with their own risks. To fully benefit from any acquisition, your company needs to ‘stick the landing’ and efficiently integrate operations and retain divisions and employees capable of ensuring that innovations continue to pay off. For many buyers, that is a tall order.

Considering your options

In an ideal world, companies would devote resources to innovation and also make the occasional acquisition to bolster their standing in particular markets. But most companies do not have the luxury to do both simultaneously. Please contact us for help examining the risks and potential rewards associated with each option.

Related Articles

Talk with the pros

Our CPAs and advisors are a great resource if you’re ready to learn even more.