KPM

Deciphering Background Checks 401(K) Missing Participants Mentorship Program Remote Work Policies Cafeteria Plan Employer Emergency Savings Accounts Retaining a Motivated Team Long-Term Care Insurance Payroll Best Practices Skills-Based Hiring Train Supervisors To Use Constructive Feedback Exemptions On Form W-4 DOL Final Rule On Independent Contractors Benefits of a Payroll Process Review Leadership Development Program Final Rule On Electronic Recordkeeping Orientation Employee Fraud Electronic Filing Qualified Retirement Plans COLAs Compensation Philosophy 2024 Health Coverage Year-End Payroll Educating Employees About Retirement Hiring Process Training Programs FUTA Neurodiversity Qualified Retirement Plan Audit HSA at-will employment Club Memberships custodial account esop Employers Payroll HRA ADA 401(k) Employee Value Proposition Agricultural tax breaks W-2 Filing Employment Tax When Hiring Loved Ones returnship programs

Minding Eligibility Rules When Managing 401(K) Enrollment

If your organization offers a 401(k) plan, you are probably aware that you can set some rules regarding when participants may enroll. Many plan sponsors strive for a happy medium between immediate enrollment and highly restricted or delayed enrollment.

As you seek to attain the right balance, bear in mind that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 restricts your ability to limit eligibility in multiple ways. Here are a few rules to keep in mind:

Age restriction. You do not have to enroll employees below the age of 21, but you cannot have an age restriction over such age. This may or may not have an impact, depending on your workforce demographics. Many plans either have no age requirement or use age 18 as the minimum age.

Delayed gratification. You can require employees to wait up to only 18 months to enter the plan. This is accomplished by requiring employees to work at least 1,000 hours over the course of a 12-month period to gain eligibility. The plan then provides that, once eligibility is met, entry into the plan is the next semiannual entry date.

For example, suppose your plan operates on a calendar year. You hire Jane on July 2, 2018, and she completes one year of service and the 1,000-hour requirement by July 2, 2019. She would enter the plan as of January 1, 2020.

Category-based standard. Plan sponsors can assign different standards for exempt vs. non-exempt employees. For example, you could set more generous eligibility rules for exempt employees. You might want to do so if the labor market is tight for the types of jobs your exempt employees hold, but not your non-exempt employees.

However, your ability to establish these job classification distinctions is limited by your need to satisfy IRS coverage tests. These tests are designed to prevent discrimination against lower-paid workers.

For example, the percentage of participating non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs) cannot be less than 70 percent of the participation rate of highly compensated employees (HCEs). In addition, the average benefits received by NHCEs must equal at least 70 percent of benefits received by HCEs. The average benefits test also features a more subjective nondiscriminatory classification component. You also can create different eligibility rules for union and non-union jobs, and those distinctions, like the delayed eligibility timing tactic, are not subject to the minimum coverage tests.

Restricting 401(k) plan participation eligibility is not for everyone, but it may help you better control administration costs. Feel free to reach out to our firm for more information.

Related Articles

Talk with the pros

Our CPAs and advisors are a great resource if you’re ready to learn even more.