KPM

Inventory Management WIP Non-GAAP Metrics Reduce Billing Bottlenecks Auditor Independence Accounting Methods Year-End Financials Auditing Revenue Recognition Inventory Management System Access To Capital M&A Due Diligence What Is Materiality Job-Costing Systems Technology Bank Reconciliation Cybersecurity New Segment Expense Disclosure Rules QuickBooks To Prepare 2024 Budgets Safeguard Organization Assets Offsetting Rules Inventory Count negotiation M&A Accounting Monthly Financial Close Shareholder advance Payroll challenges Prepare for audit QuickBooks income tax Crypto Accounting Percentage-Of-Completion Financial Statement PCAOB Overhead Mileage in QuickBooks UTPs Cross-Train Employee Benefit Plan Audits Accounts Receivable

Demystifying the Percentage-of-Completion Method

Long-term projects usually require a different approach to recognizing revenues called the ‘percentage-of-completion’ method. It is used by homebuilders, developers, creative agencies, engineering firms, and many other types of companies. Here is how it works.

Dueling methods

Contracts that last for more than one calendar year can be reported two ways:

  1. The completed contract method. It records revenues and expenses upon completion of the contract terms.
  2. The percentage-of-completion method. It ties revenue recognition to the incurrence of job costs.

GAAP generally prescribes the latter method, as long as you can make estimates that are ‘sufficiently dependable.’ Most companies with long-term contracts also must use this method for federal income tax purposes. (An exception is permitted for companies with less than $10 million in annual revenues.)

Project status

Companies typically compare the actual costs incurred to expected total costs to estimate percentage complete. Alternatively, some may opt to estimate the percentage complete with an annual completion factor. To support this technique, the IRS requires detailed documentation.

Balance sheet effect

The percentage-of-completion method can also impact your balance sheet. Suppose you are working on a $1 million, two-year project. You incur half of the expected costs in year one ($400,000) and bill the customer $450,000. From a cash perspective, it seems like you are $50,000 ahead because you have collected more than the costs you have incurred. However, you have actually underbilled based on the percentage of costs incurred.

Therefore, at the end of year one, you would report $500,000 in revenues, $400,000 in costs, and an asset for costs in excess of billings of $50,000. If you had billed the customer $550,000, however, you would report a $50,000 liability for billings in excess of costs.

Confounding factors

This method necessitates subjective estimates about expected costs. It is further complicated by job cost allocation policies, change orders, changes in estimates, and differences between book and tax accounting methods. Our team of audit and assurance experts can help train your staff on how this method works — or we can perform the analysis for you. Contact us today to learn how we can partner with you.

Related Articles

Talk with the pros

Our CPAs and advisors are a great resource if you’re ready to learn even more.