KPM

Quantifying Fraud Loss Charity Scams Employee Fraud Fraud Loss In Multiple Locations Early Revenue Recognition Liquidity Overload Keep Fraud Out Of Your Restaurant Guarding Against Fraud with Gen AI Lifestyle Analysis To Investigate Fraud Fraud prevention FinCEN Beneficial Owner Scam Vendor Fraud Residual Risk Antifraud Tax-Avoidance Scams Remote work Social Engineering in ACH/Wire Transfers Fraud risk Money Laundering Fraud FTC Accounts Receivable Phoenix Companies

Occupational Fraud Red Flags

The recently released 2020 Association of Certified Fraud Examiner’s (ACFE’s) occupational fraud study, Report to the Nations, reveals that the most common behavioral red flag exhibited by fraud perpetrators is living beyond their means. Also high on the list are financial difficulties and unusually close relationships with vendors and customers.

Some of these signs may be tough to spot if you do not work closely with an occupational thief. That is why the ACFE report also looks at correlations between fraud and non-fraud offenses and human resources issues. When these issues are present, supervisors and human resources (HR) managers may need to increase their scrutiny of an employee.

Recognize Red Flags

The vast majority (96 percent) of occupational fraud perpetrators have no previous criminal record and 86 percent have never been punished or fired by their employers for fraud. This may make identifying the thieves in your midst difficult but not impossible. The ACFE has found that approximately 85 percent of perpetrators exhibit at least one behavioral red flag before they are discovered.

Although a perpetrator may be the friendliest and most cooperative person in the office, many thieves come into conflict with colleagues or fail to follow rules. The survey participants (more than 2,500 defrauded organizations) were asked whether the perpetrator in their cases engaged in any non-fraud-related misconduct before or during the fraud incident. Close to half (45 percent) responded “yes.” Some of the most common offenses were:

  • Bullying or intimidation of others
  • Excessive absenteeism
  • Excessive tardiness

A small number also was investigated for sexual harassment and inappropriate Internet use.

In addition to misconduct, some fraud perpetrators exhibited work performance problems. Thirteen percent received poor performance evaluations, 12 percent feared the loss of their job, and 10 percent were denied a raise or promotion.

Get Involved

When misconduct or poor performance leads to disciplinary action, supervisors and HR managers have a golden opportunity to potentially stop fraud in progress. After all, the longer a scheme goes undetected, the more costly it is for the organization. Fraud schemes with a duration of less than six months have a median loss of $50,000, but those with a median duration of 14 months (the typical scheme in the ACFE report) experience losses of around $135,000.

So, if you detect smoke, look for fire. Of course, most underperforming employees are not thieves. But it probably pays to observe any worker who routinely flaunts the rules, antagonizes coworkers, or lets job responsibilities slip. You may discover other red flags, such as family problems, addiction issues, or a lifestyle that is not supported by the employee’s salary.

Limit Opportunities

Knowing your employees is only part of the solution. You also need comprehensive internal controls to limit opportunities to commit fraud. Contact us for help.

Related Articles

Talk with the pros

Our CPAs and advisors are a great resource if you’re ready to learn even more.